Peter+Joseph+-+The+trial+of+Orzatmier

The Trial Of Orzatmier - By Peter J ** Court clerk ** Brings judge into court and announces: “Silence in court – All Rise”

“Mr Swartz, please stand.”
 * Court clerk **

You are charged that on the date of 19 of January 2009 both you and your family put a young man, Mr Chandlers into a strong state of mental anguish at your home.

How do you plead, guilty or not guilty?

“Not guilty.”
 * Mr Swartz **

“Before we call in our witness, the prosecuting council would like to ask you some questions.”
 * Court clerk **

“Mr Chandlers has argued that you caused him great mental anguish at your home after he allegedly attempted to rob something from it, he could not get out of the house and had to survive on a small box of food found in your back fridge. What do you have to say for this?”
 * Prosecuting council **

“He was breaking into my home, he deserved it.”
 * Mr Swartz **

“Don’t you understand that you caused Mr Chandlers great mental anguish.”
 * Judge **

“What do you mean by mental anguish?”
 * Mr Swartz **

“Mr Chandlers was so disturbed and mentally damaged. For the past 3 months he has been seeking psychological support.”
 * Judge **

“Am I meant to care? He broke into my home.”
 * Mr Swartz **

“Tell us Mr Swartz, what do you know of this incident? Were you aware at the time of the breaking and entering?”
 * Judge **

My family was coming home from a weekend holiday when we opened our garage to find this man inside. He was greatly distressed and we didn’t know the reason. We parked our car when he ran off, at the time both my family and I were not aware of the breaking and entering. Is it true that both you and your family are Jewish?
 * Mr Swartz **
 * Judge **

Yes
 * Mr Swartz **

Could this be in any way related to the breaking and entry?
 * Judge **

No
 * Mr Swartz **

How can you be sure?
 * Judge **

I cannot be sure
 * Mr Swartz **

[Exit Mr Swartz] [Enter Mr Chandlers]

Why are you sending forth this court case?
 * Judge **

I had to pay thousands in psychological support.
 * Mr Chandlers **

Why were you robbing Mr Swartz and his family’s home?
 * Judge **

He is a Jew
 * Mr Chandlers **

That is not an answer to the question I asked you
 * Judge **

Understand this, I was stuck on the inside of their home... get it! Insiders and outsiders!
 * Mr Chandlers **

So this is a case of religious discrimination?
 * Judge **

He is a Jew; he does not deserve to be in this country, why doesn’t he go back to his homeland.
 * Mr Chandlers **

Is that a suitable answer to why you robbed his family’s home?
 * Judge **

What, you want to hear the entire list of all my reasons?
 * Mr Chandlers **

Continue
 * Judge **

Here’s some from their entire history of existence Is that a racist taunt Mr Chandlers?
 * Mr Chandlers **
 * The are to rich and possess to much power
 * They constantly say their the chosen people.
 * They killed Jesus
 * They are simply inferior.
 * Judge **

I am indeed a catholic, is it only natural to have a negative opinion towards the Jews?
 * Mr Chandlers **

Negative view indeed, but how can this relate to you breaking and entering?
 * Judge **

Take this song by Tom Lehrer Oh the Protestants hate the Catholics, and the Catholics hate the Protestants, and the Hindus hate the Moslems and everybody hates the Jews.
 * Mr Chandlers **

I am simply getting back at the Jewish people

I understand where you are coming from, I indeed am a Christian.
 * Judge **

Don’t you also hate the Jews?
 * Mr Chandlers **

Do not ask the prosecuting council a question directly.
 * Mr Chandlers Lawyer **

I understand your point Mr Chandlers, but I still do not see why you broke into this Jewish family’s home.
 * Judge **

Isn’t breaking and entering an offense, a crime, it does not matter in any way what religious beliefs this man follows; he should still be punished for his crime.
 * Mr Swartz Lawyer **

Yes, but if racial discrimination is the clear factor as to why this crime was committed, is it really his fault?
 * Mr Chandlers Lawyer **

**Mr Chandlers Lawyer** That is not what Mr Chandlers is trying to argue.

There are more reasons behind the robbing of this Jewish family’s home.

Continue, explain.
 * Judge **

Our first part of our evidence is by Dr Jones, a psychologist whom Mr Chandlers was attending before the breaking and entering.
 * Mr Chandlers Lawyer **

[Exit Mr Chandlers] [Enter Dr Jones]

Dr Jones, please discuss everything that you know relating the events leading up to the breaking and entering of Mr Chandlers.
 * Mr Chandlers Lawyer **

It’s been over 3 months since Mr Chandlers began seeing me concerning his problems. He was a very depressed man who had some major issues which he needed fixing. When I first began listing to his problems, he continuously kept rambling on about how visiting me would be of no help, his life was in ruin and nothing will ever be fixed up again.
 * Dr Jones **

I got him calmed down eventually, simply by telling him that if we didn’t get started, more of his money would be chewed up. He agreed, then to start listening and telling.

He told me that one of the reasons he was seeing me and was so depressed was because of his girlfriend leaving. As our discussion continued his mood changed to a more angry tone of voice. At this point, he discussed with me how his girlfriend left him for another man, a Jewish man.

I was astounded when he said this; it seemed that his hatred for these Jewish people was greatly built upon the fact that the man who took his girlfriend was Jewish.

For the next 3 months I continued to listen to his problems, once every two weeks, he seemed to be getting worse, his depression greater.

At that point, when he told me that life was not worth living, I told him to visit a psychiatrist and get some help from there, his situation was very bad.

After that I did not know what happened to Mr Chandlers. Then only a week ago I got a letter telling me that I would have to attend a court case were I was a witness. I had had so many patients in those 3 months; I never would have guessed Mr Chandlers would have been involved in such a different crime to his situation.

Thank you Mr Jones.
 * Judge **

[Exit Mr Jones]

Racial discrimination has been the main part of Mr Chandler’s problems, what is the relationship between this insiders and outsiders case towards this Jewish family.
 * Judge **

I would like to call in our second witness who is directly related to the breaking and entering of this Jewish family’s home, the boyfriend of Mr Chandler’s ex-girlfriend, Mr Orzatmier.
 * Mr Chandlers Lawyer **

[Enter Mr Orzatmier]

Mr Orzatmier, you are the boyfriend of Mr Chandlers ex girlfriend.
 * Prosecuting council **

Yes
 * Mr Orzatmier **

What have you got to say for yourself?
 * Prosecuting council **

My girlfriend breaking up with Mr Chandlers has nothing to do with me.
 * Mr Orzatmier **

Were you involved in any way with the breaking up of these two?
 * Judge **

No
 * Mr Orzatmier **

The only time I ever saw this Mr Chandlers was when my girlfriend and I were at a Jewish festival.

He was walking down a back street when he saw both my girlfriend and I. He stormed off after that.

After that he broke into my home.

Your home you say or your girlfriends.
 * Judge **

My girlfriends Your claiming it was your home, but it’s actually your girlfriends and then Mr Chandlers broke into a home was Mr Swartz’s family were living.
 * Mr Orzatmier **
 * Judge **

How are all these events related?

Insiders and outsiders
 * Mr Chandlers Lawyer **

What? Explain yourself
 * Judge **

Mr Orzatmier took Mr Chandlers girlfriends home, which was actually under the name of Mr Chandlers. Chandler’s ex-girlfriend willingly gave her home to Mr Orzatmier. Mr Chandlers knew this and because of his hatred towards Jewish people he decided to do something about it. Mr Chandler’s hatred for these Jewish people was built upon these same definitions of insiders and outsiders. Mr Chandler’s girlfriend was with both of them, part of the insiders group, when a Jewish man took his girlfriend, his girlfriend fell into the category of the outsiders group. After Mr Chandlers lost his home he decided to rob what was hers from the house because he did not see it fair that she should have what is his.
 * Mr Chandlers Lawyer **

Explain yourself, this insiders and outsider’s evidence is not going to help your case.
 * Judge **

Basically, to most people it is easy to sort people into two groups, one being so called insiders and the other, outsiders. An insider, to a person is someone who shares the same beliefs as everyone else, someone who they could look up to and trust because they share the same beliefs as that person. To Mr Chandlers, Mr Swartz and Mr Orzatmier fall into the outsider category, one of which they do not share the same beliefs and views, because of this, when his girlfriend, left him and moved into an outsiders group, he wanted to get back at her and her new boyfriend. When he became stuck in his own home, his depression was stretched and he fell into a worse state.
 * Mr Chandlers Lawyer **

This insiders and outsiders view is not valid. What about the outsiders group. To the outsiders group are they the insiders and to the insiders would they be the outsiders?
 * Judge **

Because of Mr Chandler’s depression after his girlfriend left him, he could have felt as though he was part of the outsiders group and so by robbing his own home he found it as a way to get back at the insiders. When he became stuck in his home, couldn’t break out of his OWN home... he went into a horribly worst depressed state, because of this, it is entirely Mr Chandlers and Mr Orzatmier fault for putting Mr Chandlers into an outsiders group which he could not cope with from his already depressed state.
 * Mr Chandlers Lawyer **

Mr Orzatmier is charged under putting mental anguish on Mr Chandlers because of his Jewish religion and beliefs, after allowing the family of Mr Swartz to stay in Mr Chandlers home, a home which his ex-girlfriend willing let Mr Orzatmier stay in. Mr Swartz is found guilty of not helping Mr Chandlers after he robbed his own home because of his mental problems. Mr Swartz prevented Mr Chandlers from leaving his own home by changing what Mr Chandlers new of exiting his own home into a different situation. Because of this, Mr Chandlers had to survive of a small box of food in the back fridge. Mr Swartz, you will also serve one month in prison. Mr Orzatmier is also charged under allowing Mr Swartz to stand as the main suspect in this court case. These two men are both charged under these crimes.
 * Judge **

Because of this, Mr Orzatmier will inhibit 18 months prison, Mr Swartz; you must pay for all the psychological support that has been needed to keep Mr Chandlers sane. As of the breaking and entering, both Mr Orzatmier and Mr Swartz and Mr Chandler’s ex-girlfriend must leave Mr Chandlers home in the following hours.

“Guilty”

“Handcuff both Mr Swartz and Mr Orzatmier and take them to the cells officer.”

//Edit this if you must, but it is still mine....//